COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF COSMETIC OUTCOME BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY & SINGLE INCISION LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

Authors

  • Sanjay Kumar M.O. Specialist, General Surgery, M.G.M.S.C. Khaneri, Dept. of Health and Family Welfare Himachal Pradesh.
  • Ashok Kaundal Associate Professor, General Surgery, Dept. of General Surgery I.G.M.C. Shimla.
  • Suneet Katoch M.O. Specialist, General Surgery, M.G.M.S.C. Khaneri, Dept. of Health and Family Welfare Himachal Pradesh.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32553/ijmbs.v5i8.2065

Keywords:

SILC, cLC, Cosmetic outcome

Abstract

Aim: Comparative analysis of cosmetic outcome between Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Method:  Patients suffering from symptomatic cholelithasis were randomly subjected to Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional four ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (cLC). Data analyzed included cosmetic outcome,

Results: The body image score for SILC group ranged from 30 to 44 with mean score of 40.76 ± 2.773 while that for cLC group ranged from 33 to 42 with mean score of 38.28 ± 1.969. p-value for the comparison stands 0.001 which shows that patients undergoing SILC had better cosmetic perception of their body image compared to cLC group

Conclusion: SILC is better cosmetic perception as compare to cLC

Keywords: SILC, cLC, Cosmetic outcome

Downloads

Published

2021-08-06

How to Cite

Kumar, S. ., Kaundal, A. ., & Katoch, S. . (2021). COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF COSMETIC OUTCOME BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY & SINGLE INCISION LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY. International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies, 5(8). https://doi.org/10.32553/ijmbs.v5i8.2065

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 8 (2021)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>